BARRIO BOYS.COM

TEAM TORRES LINKS
*U R HERE*

THE BARRIO BOYS
MYSPACE MUSIC!

PRINT IT YOURSELF

PR VEGAN

FROM THE DESK OF ANTHONY TEAM TORRES

This page is for making & promoting movies and pertinent links.
Please send me an form mail if there's something I should know about.

 

SUBJECT: Vegan Bodybuilding & Links
DATE: January 18, 2007

Tony El Guapo is still on the Vegan Bodybuilding kick. Some key points to consider:
1. Kellogs Total now has a soy-fortified cereal that has 10 grams of protein per cup. Which isn't a whole heck a lot of cereal for that much protein. Add soy milk and you're up to 16 grams of protein.
2. SOY SHAKES! Oh, we sampled two. One that was soy, one that was vegetable based. The veggie based one was an affront to nature! Avoid by all means necessary! Avoid! The Soy stuff is fair and well. You have to keep a few things in mind... You need a blender. Handmixing will lead to powder clumps. You add water, then powder. Mix. Then add a frozen bannana to cool it out. You peel and cut up a bannana and place in wax paper, then put in freezer. Lukewarm soy protein smoothies are an affront to nature. Add frozen bananas. This creams it up, makes it richer and palatable. You can add OJ or frozen berries, as well. But Water-Protein-Banana is the bare minimum, and quite adequate.

3. Soybeans. I made a soybean/blackbean vegan chili for Tony, and though Soybeans have a crazy amount of protein your body fails to absorb so much of that protein in its natural bean state. Vegan crumbles, patties, etc- the processing someway or another makes your body better able to absorb the protein. Who'd of thunk it? All the same, it's pretty great to do a vegan chili. So though Chili is more Mex than PR, food is food and vegans can't be choosers after choosing vegan. You'll eat what you've been given. Shut Up!

That's the finale thought. Vegans eat a lot of carbs and little protein, which is why it's a dumb diet if you want to lose weight. But you can gain quality muscle if you keep track of your protein intake. At least half your weight in grams of protein (Tony is 160- he needs AT LEAST 80 grams of protein a day, but he should have 120 grams. That's a lot of soymilk!)

Happy eatin!- Anthony Team Torres

SUBJECT: Vegan Bodybuilding & Links
DATE: August 10, 2006

Tony El Guapo has it in his head that he's going to be a vegan bodybuilder. He loathes the image of vegans as either soft and doughy or rail thin sticks. You could never compare a natural bodybuilder to a steroid enhanced bodybuilder. A steroid user can quit using steroids, but he's already reaped the benefits of steroids and will maintain that edge over a natural bodybuilder. That's why most natural bodybuilders aren't as impressive as say the guys in the 70's and 80's. They all juiced up to one form or another. And if they juiced, quit, and now compete natural, well... it's kind of a sham. They beat the plateau with drugs. Nothing natural about that. Muscle memory is a crazy thing.

All said, it is possible to look better than average, in person, with a vegan diet. But in photos, you'll be less than roid impressive. Why? Because you need to understand posing and lighting and tanning and all the other secrets bodybuilders use when the compete on stage. It's a lot of muscle control you only develop through deliberately flexing and holding a pose for a period of time.

Let's face it- some people are naturally gifted with muscular and cut bodies. They just got awesome bodies and that's that. But those people aren't the norm in bodybuilding as the super motivated winners have a damn good reason for working out: they're either fat or super skinny. They have a deep desire to change their appearance, and that's what keeps them working out. It's a bit of vanity, a lot of esteem. And so long as they don't abuse drugs in the pursuit, there's no harm in self betterment.

Tony's been joking that "vegan bodybuilding competitions are really slim." He thinks he can take them on, quick. But the jokes on Tony. You gotta work out to develop your potential, and then work harder to improve on that.

As I have quite a deep knowledge of bodybuilding (as opposed to strength training which has a different approach, I went ahead and looked up links. Tony's trainer, Piratés Craig, sent Tony some links, as well, so there may be some overlap.

Some thoughts on Vegan bodybuilding:
You need protein. You need protein supplementation in the form of soy protein powder shakes. One heaping scoop for 8 oz of water (which is a cup)

Can Tony get built? Yes. It's a matter of workouts as much as diet. You need the protein to grow new muscle tissue. That's about it. Eat how you want to eat- all day long, or wait until night to pack it in. For a growth program you should focus on the workout itself.

Training Session One:
Got up with Tony.
He's been doing some benching, incline exclusively to develop the upper chest. So I tried something I read last night. The thinking is if you REALLY want to grow fast, you have to use heavy weight. The downside is you can only pump out a few reps. It's not enough to encourage muscle growth. The answer is a high number of sets.

An experienced lifter or someone with strength could lift 140 for 12 reps. Not Tony. So to get him there, he lifted 140 for 2 reps, for 8 sets with 30 seconds between sets.

The math means Tony did 16 repetitions. Which is good. We'll see how he feels tomorrow.

Then he did bicep curls, 6 sets of 3 reps. He could only handle 50lbs plus bar. It's always a shock to everyone when they realize how weak they are. But you can up your lifts pretty quick as your body just has to get adjusted to the movements. No need to be discouraged.

Then he did squats of 50 lbs for 21 reps, one set only. Tony has the skinny legs. I want the guy proportionate. Since he's doing this for vanity, the emphasis will be on chest, shoulders and traps to sell the idea that he's bigger and stronger than in practice. Still, he should work out his legs because maybe he can develop them. Maybe he can have Tom Platz thighs. It's up to him to show up and lift the weights.

 

We cut it short after that set. 20 minutes had passed. I have other things to do.

Here's the links as I promised:

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/mahler53.htm
http://www.mikemahler.com/newsletter/

Mike Mahler is the first vegan bodybuilder I heard of. I bought a huge stack of M&F magazines for cheap at the Orlando Library Bookstore and in the letter's column someone wrote to thank the editors for featuring this vegan lifter. I didn't have that article in my stack, but this is the guy, as he's all about kettleball workouts in that M&F article and on his site.

He writes that he got into vegetarianism in part due to the Cro-Mags, which is pretty funny, as they were -at a time- extremely violent individuals. It's no secret they beat up people for fun. Far from the goodtimes of today. Anyhoo, he has a lot of resources and articles online that debunk myths of vegan bodybuilding. Mahler is not the first nor only vegan bodybuilder, and I don't think he considers himself a bodybuilder as much as a trainer. He is the most prolific and productive in terms of writing output. So check him out. His links resulted in the following links...

http://www.workingclassfitness.com/MMAStrength.shtml

http://www.trainforstrength.com/workouts.shtml

http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/vegetarian-bodybuilding.asp

This site has a vegan meal plan that's quite easy to follow.

 

SUBJECT: FESTIVAL FEVER
DATE: JANUARY 18, 2007

I'm getting stuff together for the Barrio Boys screening at Ola Fest. It's a lot of fun, as all I ever wanted to do related to Barrio Boys now has a darn good excuse for getting done. My screenprinting will happen tonight. Other stuff, as well.

I'll post pix to the Photo site so everyone can enjoy the beauty of the pieces.

Just wanted to update this page. Didn't realize I haven't thought much of much since August. Aye! Que Lastima!

SUBJECT: 1 Man Band
DATE: August 2, 2006

I shot a scene with Craig and Stacey this weekend. Solo. Only me with a GL-1 and a Seinheiser shotgun mic hooked up to a wireless link for onboard recording.

Here's some thoughts on it...
1. One person can hold the boom and operate the camera. You're gonna make a movie. It's not going to be as slick as ATL, but you will make a movie. To accomplish an ATL, you'll need a grip truck, dedicated grip, electric, and camera crew, not to mention a full production to support their efforts. Plus ancillary crew like Steadicam operator/owner, and so forth. I was blown away by the imagery of ATL. And at the same time, I'm thrilled by the low-tech imagery I'm getting. Ultimately, it's faces and words and movements. And sound having as much importance as image (meaning get clean sound with a shotgun mic aimed at the subjects)

2. You can shoot without deep memorization. Just break down the shots and shoot the parts for short term memorization. Meaning, if you have a 5 page scene, don't bother with a master shot. Run through a half page a few times, switch angle, run it through. I tend to move the mic to the off-camera subject, as sometimes the line reads are better off camera than on. So you shoot a half page at a time. Sure it'd be great to watch it unfold in real time, but masters are such a headache to edit, as they prevent inter-scene editing from occuring. You can glom them together and have a movie. I've done that. And I'm no longer a fan of it. Use all the tools at your disposal, editing being the fundamental tool of moving images.

3. Always keep the camera running for rehearsal.
This is why I'm shooting myself as an experiment. I've found golden moments etched into my mind but lost forever as I had no way of signaling for the operator to shoot right then and there. And as an operator, I understand they get tired and want a break so you shut everything down. As a filmmaker, it gets frustrating when you see you're getting it on rehearsal but losing it on the take. So that's the upside of a 1 man band. With digital video you keep rolling for 60 minutes. Three minutes here, four minutes there aren't a huge cause of concern. Just roll. You'll get some unguarded moments...

4. Boom in the shot? Digitally erase it.
Digital video solutions don't stop at a computer and a camera. You need a good mic and in a perfect world a wireless mic system. Camera manufacturers are not audio engineers. They'll give you superior optics, but the sound is universally crap. So that's like a $400 investment to own a wireless get up. You need a good wideangle lens adapter. (Thanks Perfect Sky Productions for all the hook ups!)

And then there's software. It's not just final cut studio. You need an after effects or commotion. Why? Digitally erase stuff or clone it out. Sure, you could do it in Photoshop, too, but commotion is just as well for immediate cleaning up of a shot.
You can do it manually or automate.

So I am liberated from my bad booming. The shot is NOT ruined. Clone over your mistakes.

And then you always have to color correct it and at the minimum adjust the gamma.

That's the big thing with DV: you must treat it like film. Watch the deleted scenes of a movie like Transporter 2. The Feature movie is crisp and vibrant. The deleted scenes look poor. Why? The final movie is put through color correction and scene image adjustment. The deleted scenes are raw shots from the set. Untouched. Boring and flat. You light enough to get the shot, and know you can print contrasty at the end.

You have to touch the image. You have to manipulate the colors and gamma and levels.


A. Improve improv with rehearsal
We just went at it. And that's cool. You shoot and shoot until you feel you have something there. The uncool part is that there are too many hats for a one man band. Watching the takes, I realized I had given no direction, and all my responses to questions were poor, at best.

Am I a rotten director? No. This is an experiment. And the result is you have to write the script and you have to work off the script to develop the character and their interactions. All the things that fall under the umbrella of director can't be ignored because you're holding the camera and boom. I learned that this weekend.

B. Understand what the story is about. Is the movie about Donna or Piratees trainer? Or is it about Tony El Guapo? It's Tony El Guapo. That's the point of view you focus on. When you have to drop shots, you can lose things without losinig the plot only if you understand the movie.

C. Making movies is everything. Yeah, I could do it perfect with awesome rehearsals and so on. But the experiment is to see if I can pull it off, and what compensations are required.

The compensation I see now is SCRIPT and a readthrough, and basic scene work so people understand the relationships and where threads of narrative join together for the fabric of the movie.

AAAA. If you just meet up and shoot, withhold judgement until you review the footage. If you cast friends and think the traditional actor monlogues would be a waste of everyone's time, then shoot a scene from the movie and let them go at it. This becomes your audition / rehearsal. What sounds off on set may be spot on at the computer editing session. So withhold judgement. Movie magic is captured through a lens, not your on-set dulled eye. Watch your "dailies" as you capture tapes, and review it when selecting shots in Final Cut pro.

With that, I'm nodding off. - Anthony Team Torres

SUBJECT: Trailer Stuff
DATE: August 2, 2006

As a goof, I checked out Adobe.com and their after effects page for info. Here's a pretty solid link on creating a website for a movie. No, it's more involved than just html coding. But what do you expect? It's a worldwide medium and now you can go head to head with anyone. And at the same time, you are butting heads with everyone.

 

SUBJECT: The Best DV Book You've Never Heard of
DATE: June 29 2006

By a chance lark , I found this book:

Five Essential Steps in Digital Video: A DV moviemaker's Tricks of the Trade by Denise Ohio, published in 2001/2002 by Que Corp.

Of all the books I've read, and I've read 'em all, this is the thickest, least patronizing, and most informative. Quite frankly I can no longer recommend books by first time filmmakers or any that hype Final Cut Pro or what not.

Whereas the Guerilla's Handbook is marred by the author's poor taste in movies and the UK focus, and the Raindance Producer's guide STEALS passages from Dov SS Siemen's book, and every other book is so specific to one filmmaker's path, this filmmaker is working outside of the major production centers and shares a true wealth of information relating to producing small DV films over 820 pages and a DVD full of releases, interviews, and more.

If I were to dream of what a perfect film book would have, this is it. And the messed up thing? I haven't heard of it until this month, June 2006! I guess they focus on educational markets rather than glutting every B&N out there.

So if you are curious about "Oh, where do I turn?" Turn to this book and start turning pages. Even the marketing section is better than the film marketing books I've read! This is a COMPLETE RESOURCE! Even if you know it all, you'll learn a few things more. Those forms on the DVD make this book totally worthwhile. Plenty of books publish the form, but next to none actually share them digitally.

Go to Amazon and buy this book. I just bought another copy for only $6.50 (shipping included), which is crying shame when so much junk is out there and none of that goes to the author. (That's why I hate buying used CDs, as well.) So though that sucks for the author, it's great for you because you can get the best book ever written for under $10!
Denise Ohio's website is HolyToledo.com.

Happy Reading- Anthony Team Torres

 

SUBJECT: BUSINESS OF DV SURVIVAL
DATE: June 26 2006

Furthering on Christine Vachon and the survival of indie film companies, I found this link to a Wired News article from January 2006. I was a huge fan of the idea behind InDigEnt. The DVD for November is a must see for shooting and making DV look good. (Though I think the DVD for "Broken" pulls all the ideas together.) This article is a bit doom and gloom for a company that is still operating. Read about InDigEnt here . This article is "DV Studio Can't Make a Buck" by Jason Silverman on Wired.com, should the link go bad.

Great Quote is as follows:

His can't-beat-'em, must-join-'em theory explodes the predominant myth of independent filmmaking: that you can shoot your own films, premiere them at Sundance, sell them for a fair profit and then make more. "If you don't own the means of distribution, there is no valid production model," Kliot said.

TEAM TORRES THOUGHTS:
The article points out that the InDigEnt slate of films have all been one offs by 12 directors. There is no recognizable element behind the films as a whole. If you look at Killer Films, the relationship is strong between Christine and her directors. Sure, she does a lot of first timers. Yet the core of her films are collaborations with Todd Haynes. Todd Haynes is the "brand," despite there being a marked difference between all his films. He hasn't made the same film twice, and for that people know Todd Haynes and enjoy his work.

We've placed Tony El Guapo under exclusive contract for the next five years. We love Tony, and think his idea's are awesome, even if it is a bit trying at times. Most times. All the time. But the results compensate for the headaches.

Oh, and from a camera debate post: ItŐs about the story not the toys we use to tell the story.

Snagged this from hdforindies. It's about promoting a movie for critics:

 

 

SUBJECT: SCREEN PRINTING VS SCREEN WRITING
DATE: June 24 2006

Furthering my riff from June 10, 2006 (see two posts below) and applying my own advice, I've got a set up for screenprinting now. Pearl has a coupon for 30% off supplies until the end of June. A new crafting store has opened in Orlando, and had a 50% off coupon in the Sentinel.

From pearl I bought a 14" flat edged graphic Squeegee and screenprint clamp hinges. From the craft store I bought a bunch of t-shirts (6 for $10) plus a speedball fabric screenprint kit. I think the kit is a rip-off at $49.95, but at 50% off, it's quite alright. It comes with the photosensitizer stuff that's kind of necessary to do photo-stencils.

All this has been a flurry since last Sunday, June 18th. Which was also father's day. So Sunday to Friday has been a crazy accumulation of screen print and vinyl sticker materials.

A more rational side of me said "Stop. Focus on screenwriting and less on screen printing." Should I favor one over the other? No. Both represent two ends of the movie spectrum: Making and Marketing. Both are creative tasks that have their own tools.

Alas, it's easy to be swept away by tools, be it the latest greatest bells and whistles editing software that has bugs yet to be discovered, or freaking out about inks and four color presses and heat conveyor belts. At a certain point you have to cut yourself off from the "knowledge base" and go it alone off intuition and maybe a reference book with the tools you have at hand.

Screenprinting is quite beautiful in that you can make a big deal about it as an artform and andy warhol and Flatstock and all that. And it's a trade. An unglamorous, unpretentious trade of signage and advertising and t-shirts. Gig and movie posters are a small part of that.

So why freak out about it when it's a simple as pushing ink through a screen to transfer the ink to a paper to leave an impression. Clear enough to promote a movie.

Which is what writing is about: communicating an idea to enable the production of a movie.

I was criticized before for making too many stickers for movies I had ideas about. "You make more stickers than movies." I was right. They were wrong. Your marketing matters as much as the movie. Because if you don't have a way to communicate your int